RayDev
An early poster-review prototype

A second look.
Before the
final yes.

Compare an event poster with its approved brief. Bring information gaps and visual concerns into one review, with evidence people can inspect.

Explore the sample See the review approach

Browser-only walkthrough. Fixed examples, no AI analysis.

One poster. Two perspectives.Sample / 01
A design gathering FUTURE
FORMS
24 OCT 2026

13:00 — 17:00
STUDIO 04

Fictional event / Original sample
Approved brief
Future Forms
Date25 Oct 2026
VenueStudio 04,
North Hall
ContactEvent desk
A date worth checking

24 Oct on the poster. 25 Oct in the brief.

Example
Original artwork and fictional event data, created for this demo.

The details connect.
The review should, too.

A poster can look ready while one critical detail is still wrong. RayDev’s proposed workflow brings the source, the design, and the reviewer together.

Information, against the brief

Compare the title, date, venue, and contact instructions with the approved source.

Visuals, in context

Surface readability, placement, and missing elements for a person to inspect.

Evidence, before approval

Keep each concern connected to a poster region and a source requirement. People make the final decision.

Inside the sample review

Follow a finding
back to its source.

Select a concern to highlight its location and compare the evidence. Switch to the revised poster to see the corresponding example edit.

Sample walkthroughFixed illustrative findings. No AI analysis, upload, or automatic approval.
Future FormsFictional design event

Poster

Original sample
Future Forms / 2026FF

FUTURE
FORMS

Synthetic event artwork · RayDev demo

The outlined area is the selected evidence region. You can also select a region directly.

View the selected finding

Approved brief

Sample source
Event requirements

Use the approved details below on the final poster.

Title
Future Forms
Date & time
25 October 2026
13:00–17:00
Venue
Studio 04,
North Hall
Contact instruction
Questions: event desk
Visual requirement
Keep supporting copy clearly readable against the background.

Synthetic brief. All names, locations, and event details are fictional.

Illustrative findings

4

Approved source
Poster evidence

Local demo state only. This does not approve the poster.

Return to the poster
What makes a finding structured?

Each sample finding carries a category, source requirement, observed content, and normalized poster region. A review flag records only your choices in this browser session.


        

      

    


    

      
Designed around
a human decision.
The intended MCP-based workflow connects inputs, model-assisted checks, and evidence. It keeps final approval with the team reviewing the work.

      
Planned architectureNot connected in this demo

      
    
        
  1. 1
    Poster + approved brief
    Bring the design and its source requirements together.
    2. 
        
  2. 2
    MCP-connected checks
    Evaluate information and visual concerns with model assistance.
    3. 
        
  3. 3
    Evidence-linked findings
    Return structured observations tied to the source and poster region.
    4. 
        
  4. 4
    People review & approve
    Inspect the evidence, resolve concerns, and decide what is ready.
    5. 
      

    


    

      

        
Where RayDev stands
A focused start.
A clear next step.
We are a five-person team in an AI education program, exploring an MCP-based review system for event posters.
Try the sample review

        

          
Now
A browser prototype
A synthetic poster, approved brief, and prewritten findings demonstrate the intended review experience.

          
Next
Evaluate Claude for the workflow
Claude use is in planning and evaluation. An actual Claude API integration has not been implemented in this demo.

          
To validate
Usefulness in real reviews
Review quality and practical value still need testing. We have no verified performance metrics or paying customers to report.

        

      

    

    

      
A few useful distinctions.

      

        
Is this performing AI analysis?
No. Every finding is a fixed demonstration example authored for this fictional event. Selecting a finding or switching versions changes the browser display; it does not call a model.

        
Can I check my own poster here?
This version uses only the included synthetic samples. There is no file upload, server, account, or data collection form.

        
Does a reviewed finding mean approval?
No. The review buttons demonstrate local review state. Final approval belongs to a person. RayDev does not make legal infringement determinations or automatically approve a poster.